USPTO serial 74687976
VACCICARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VACCICARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARNIE WRIGHT BARNHORST
MARNIE WRIGHT BARNHORST ESQ THE TRADEMARK GROUP, APLC7850 IVANHOE AVELA JOLLA, CA 92037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | microchip-microprocessor, computer memory card, other computer hardware, and computer software for use in medical and public health record-keeping | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 1, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |