USPTO serial 74688154
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
D - 83233 Bernau am Chiemsee, DE
D - 83233 Bernau am Chiemsee, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael F. Scalise
MICHAEL F SCALISE HODGSON, RUSS, ANDREWS, WOODS & GOODYEAR1800 ONE M & T PLZBUFFALO, NY 14203UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beers; mineral, aerated water and drinking water containing carbonic acid; soda waters, lemonade, orangeade, carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and powdered concentrate for making lemonade, orangeade, carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks, fruit drinks and isotonic drinks; soft drinks that provide an energy boost | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | whiskey, gin, sherry, port, brandy spirits, alcoholic bitters, wines, potable spirits, distilled spirits and liqueurs; prepared alcoholic cocktails and aperitifs with a distilled alcoholic liquor or wine base; wine coolers, prepared wine cocktails, wine punches | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |