Drawing for IDEAS SOLUTIONS RESULTS

USPTO serial 74688286

IDEAS SOLUTIONS RESULTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOLFSON, FRANCES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDEAS SOLUTIONS RESULTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Upton Douglass

SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK & LEHRMAN, PC633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely conducting classes and seminars in the fields of accounting, business, account auditing, tax preparation, business management, financial management, and use of computer softwareACTIVE—
042development, planning, design, programming and implementation of computer information systems for others in the field of business and economic trends and practices, and maintenance of computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 31, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 1997DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 28, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 28, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 1996DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 28, 1996DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 28, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance