USPTO serial 74688379
Q Q Q
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVY, MICHAEL S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Q Q Q?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Drake
JAMES J DRAKE NALCO CHEMICAL COMPANYONE NALCO CTRNAPERVILLE, IL 60563-1198UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing specialty chemical additives used as - anti-corrosives, antiscalants, and microbiocides for addition to industrial and municipal waters; coagulants and flocculants used to remove contaminants from industrial and municipal waters; wet and dry strength agents, retention aids, antifoams, microbiocides, pitch and stickies control additives, inorganic fillers, starch additives, white water treatment agents, and the like in the manufacture of pulp and paper; coagulants, flocculants, antifoams, agglomeration agents, microbiocides, dust control additives, crystal modifiers, dewatering agents, and the like in the production beneficiation and transport of mineral substances (including bauxite, kaolin, iron ore, coal, and precious metals); metal working lubricants and rust preventatives; semiconductor polishing aids; adjuvants for pesticides and herbicides; and, related chemical additive feed and monitoring equipment | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |