Drawing for CODEM

USPTO serial 74688396

CODEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CODEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GREGORY A. NELSON

GREGORY A NELSON LAKEVIEWAKERMAN, SENTERFITT & EIDSON, PAP O BOX 3188WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402-3188

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016paper and cardboard goods, namely, instructional and teaching material, stationery, printed matter used in the manufacture of printed publications and books, promotional pamphlets, promotional printed pads, pamphlets, brochures, newsletters, journals, magazines, newspapers, and newspaper supplements, all including promotional material; instant win cards, lottery cards, lottery tickets, boxes, greeting cards, note cards, postcards, score cards, playing cards, wrapping paper, plastic wrapping, cardboard wrapping material; paper or plastic transparencies; posters and placards; signs of paper or cardboard; all consisting of or including a patterned templateACTIVE—
017plastics in the form of opaque or non-opaque sheets, films, cards, bands, strips or rolls; all consisting of or including a patterned template bearing a coded image, or for decoding imagesACTIVE—
028game cards; game boards; promotional game cards; boards or cards for use in promotional gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 30, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 11, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 29, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 5, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 8, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 16, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 3, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 25, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance