Drawing for AVIS FLIGHTCHECK

USPTO serial 74688467

AVIS FLIGHTCHECK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANCINI, CYNTHIA H
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AVIS FLIGHTCHECK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID S. FLEMING

DAVID S FLEMING BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing on line flight and travel information services rendered by computer by means of a global computer networkABANDONEDSep 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 1998EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 25, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 28, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 22, 1997ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 2, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 2, 1997ABNDABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB—
Jul 2, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 2, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 16, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 15, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 1995AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 24, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 1995IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance