USPTO serial 74688755
BIL HANNA WA SHIFFA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2681460Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 28, 2003
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIL HANNA WA SHIFFA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fairfax Station, VA
Fairfax Station, VA
Fairfax Station, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL E. KATTMAN
DANIEL E. KATTMAN REINHARD, BOERNER, VAN DEUREN SCSUITE 21001000 NORTH WATER STREET, SUITE 2100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed materials, namely, books and newsletters featuring information relating to cooking and the culinary arts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 19, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 16, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |