USPTO serial 74689000
EXOTICAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXOTICAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Eakin
JAMES E EAKIN GRAHAM & JAMES LLP600 HANSEN WAYPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | automobile and motor vehicle body repair and finishing for others, repair and maintenance of automobiles, automobile detailing, and restoration of motor vehicles | ACTIVE | Jan 13, 1999 |
| 039 | leasing and rental of motor vehicles | ACTIVE | Jan 13, 1999 |
| 042 | motor vehicle dealership | ACTIVE | Jan 13, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ghanma, Tony
- Other trademarks owned by Ghanma, Tony
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EXOTICAR
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |