Drawing for SMOOTH & SHINE

USPTO serial 74689389

SMOOTH & SHINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMOOTH & SHINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE D. MANDEL

LAWRENCE D MANDEL MANDEL & PESLAK, LLC80 SCENIC DR STE 5FREEHOLD, NJ 07728UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008nail care buffing boardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 24, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 24, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 23, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 29, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 15, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 29, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 1997UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 1996REINREINSTATED—
Sep 25, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance