Drawing for AIRPLAN

USPTO serial 74691633

AIRPLAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1976668Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 28, 1996
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRPLAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph M. Lafata

Joseph M. Lafata Harness, Dickey & Pierce PLC5445 Corporate Drive, Suite 200Troy, MI 48098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039air transportation and aircraft management and leasing services for non-owner business aviation usersEXPIREDSep 26, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2019CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
May 28, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2007RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 9, 200789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 12, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 19, 2006PR89RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9—
Oct 19, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 7, 2006PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
May 22, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Mar 7, 200689AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Mar 7, 2006E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 20028.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 8, 20028.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Apr 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 1996R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 5, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 2, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 30, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance