USPTO serial 74691813
INSTRUMENT AND CONTROLS ASSET MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSTRUMENT AND CONTROLS ASSET MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marilyn C. Malony
MARILYN C MALONY LISKOW & LEWIS, PCONE SHELL SQ701 POYDRAS ST STE 5000NEW ORLEANS, LA 70139-5099Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business management services, namely, managing, compiling and replacing inventories, tracking maintenance costs, establishing maintenance schedules, analysis of mechanical control system performance, and managing repair services | ABANDONED | May 1, 1995 |
| 037 | construction, repair, and asset management services for commercial and industrial heavy mechanical equipment by compiling inventories, tracking maintenance costs, managing and replacing inventories, establishing maintenance schedules, performing analysis of control systems performance, and managing repair services | ABANDONED | May 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 2, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |