USPTO serial 74691842
GOAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MITCHELL E RADIN
MITCHELL E RADIN COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP40 W 57TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | men's cologne, eau de toilette, after shave, after shave balm, bar soap, body wash, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair styling aids, namely, hair sprays, gels and mousses, hair tonic, anti-perspirant, deodorant, facial cleansers, scrubs, namely, facial cleansers with scrubbing particles for deep cleaning, shave creams, tanning products, namely, tanning creams and lotions; women's perfume, cologne, eau de toilette, body splash, bar soap, body wash, exfolients, namely, skin creams designed to remove layers of dry skin, body lotions, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair styling aids, namely, hair sprays, gels and mousses, facial cleansers, scrubs, namely, facial cleansers with scrubbing particles for deep cleaning, shave creams, tonics, namely, hair tonics and skin tonics or astringents, facial moisturizers, bath salts, tanning products, namely, tanning creams and lotions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |