USPTO serial 74691995
POWER 3D AUDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWER 3D AUDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward J. Treska
EDWARD J TRESKA KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR620 NEWPORT CTR DRSIXTEENTH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-8016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware, namely, computer sound processing circuitry; computer PCMCIA cards; computer workstations comprising stereo sound processing circuitry; amplifiers; receivers; phonographs; speakers; tape decks; CD playback and/or recording apparatus; portable stereo units; computer data storage media for recording and playing enhanced audio material, namely, diskettes, floppy disks, solid-state cartridges, hard discs, CD ROM discs, magnetic tape, and optical discs; audio recording and/or audio-visual recordings stored on magnetic tape or optical discs containing entertainment materials; audio and/or audio-visual storage media, namely, compact discs, mini-discs, laser discs, video discs, analog or digital audio cassette tapes, analog or digital video cassette tapes for professional or home use, VCR cassette tapes, motion picture film, and optical disc or magnetic media for storing audio and/or audio-visual recording containing entertainment material | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |