USPTO serial 74692102
R13
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with R13?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Islington, Ontario, M9B 1R1, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ben D. Tobor
BEN D TOBOR BRACEWELL & PATTERSON LLPP O BOX 61389HOUSTON, TX 77208-1389UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | chemical processing plants for the production of chlorine dioxide, namely, processing units for the production of chlorine dioxide comprised primarily of generators and reactors, and a reactor unit for processing byproducts produced from chlorine dioxide production | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SUPERIOR PLUS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Sterling Pulp Chemicals, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by SUPERIOR PLUS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named R13
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |