USPTO serial 74692389
AVALANCHE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AVALANCHE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY J. SOTIS
MARY J SOTIS NHL ENTERPRISES, LP1251 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10020-1198UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing commemorative of and intended to show support for a professional hockey team known as Avalanche, namely shirts, jerseys, sweaters, jackets, sweatshirts, T-shirts, footwear, pants, sweatpants, warm-up suits, wristbands, headbands, shorts, caps, hats, socks, nightshirts, scarves, mittens and cloth bibs | ACTIVE | Aug 15, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |