USPTO serial 74692453
GN NETTEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2344254Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 25, 2000
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GN NETTEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DK-1016 Copenhagen K, DK
DK-1016 Copenhagen K, DK
DK-1016 Copenhagen K, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. IRIS HESS
M IRIS HESS LADAS & PARRY5670 WILSHIRE BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | apparatus and instruments for testing of communication equipment and networks, namely, fiber optic testers and fiber optic measuring equipment; optical time domain reflectometers, hand-held communication test sets and meters, high performance LAN/WAN/ATM protocol and network analyzers, network monitors, trunk and access line testers; and computer based testers for testing and storing information relative to diagnosis and troubleshooting of communication equipment and networks | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | testing of communication apparatus and networks for others, namely, on-site or remote monitoring, analysis and troubleshooting of telecommunications equipment and networks | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GN Great Nordic Limited
- Other trademarks owned by GN Great Nordic Limited
- Other trademarks owned by GN Great Nordic Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GN NETTEST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2003 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1996 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |