USPTO serial 74692597
MILLENNIUM NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MILLENNIUM NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Allison Strickland
J ALLISON STRICKLAND SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP230 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10169-0079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | cable television transmission services and interactive switched digital and analog communications and telecommunications services, namely, video on demand transmission services featuring movies, sports, cultural and other events; and video and audio teleconferencing and telephone communications services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing multiple-user access to various interactive multimedia information networks for the transfer and dissemination of entertainment, education and personal services capabilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |