USPTO serial 74692621
NETEXPERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 23, 1997
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NETEXPERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
OBJECTIVE SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS, INC.
Roseville, CA
Other trademarks owned by OBJECTIVE SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS, INC.
Objective Systems Integrators, Inc.
Folsom, CA
Other trademarks owned by Objective Systems Integrators, Inc.
Objective Systems Integrators, Inc.
Folsom, CA
Other trademarks owned by Objective Systems Integrators, Inc.
Objective Systems Integrators, Inc.
Folsom, CA
Other trademarks owned by Objective Systems Integrators, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregg B. Brelsford
GREGG B. BRELSFORD Law Office of Gregg B. Brelsford, PLLC164 SOUTH 900 EASTSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in network operational support and management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 18, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OBJECTIVE SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Objective Systems Integrators, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Objective Systems Integrators, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Objective Systems Integrators, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NETEXPERT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 16, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |