USPTO serial 74692642
PROVIDENT BANK USA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROVIDENT BANK USA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan L. Mizer
SUSAN L MIZER BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER, COPLAN & ARONOFF2300 BP AMERICA BLDG200 PUBLIC SQCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2378Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | banking services providing by electronic means; providing financial investment information and financial management information by electronic means | ACTIVE | May 25, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2000 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |