USPTO serial 74693275
BUGSY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HORRALL, PATRICIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUGSY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. MacDermott
MICHAEL J MACDERMOTT PRETTY, SCHROEDER, BRUEGGEMANN & CLARKSTE 2000444 S FLOWER STLOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2921Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetic and toiletry preparations, namely, lipstick, eyeliner, face and body soaps, bubble bath, shampoo; hair rinse; hair conditioner; hair spray; hair styling gel; and dentifrices, perfume, eau de toilette, cologne, after shave lotion, skin moisturizer, body powder, bath and shower gel, and talc lotion | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, jeans, shirts, jackets, vests, pants, sweaters, tops, jumpsuits, shorts, hats, trench coats, suspenders, overalls, shortalls, caps, dresses, skirts, sweatshirts, T-shirts, sweatpants, neckties, lingerie, sleepwear, swimwear, coats, suits, robes, belts, briefs, coats, leotards, leggings, hosiery, gloves, scarves, ponchos, visors, tights, and footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 22, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |