USPTO serial 74693416
BLANC DE CHINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLANC DE CHINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vivian Polak
VIVIAN POLAK LEBOEUF, LAMB, GREENE & MACRAE, LLP125 W 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019-5389UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | porcelain, namely, lamp bases, pots and figurines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 2, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 1, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |