USPTO serial 74694051
THE NEXT GENERATION OF DIE LUBRICATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZERVAS, ALBERT JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE NEXT GENERATION OF DIE LUBRICATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael C. Payden
MICHAEL C PAYDEN LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD815 N CHURCH STROCKFORD, IL 61103-6979UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | spraying apparatus for specialty lubricants used in stamping press die operations, comprising one or more of the following, machines for spraying specialty die lubricants, nozzles for specialty die lubricant spraying machines, reservoir tanks for lubricants, foot switch for operating lubricating machines, cover plate for closing off air ports or lubricant ports, actuators for controlling lubricant output, ejectors, feed pumps and regulators | ABANDONED | Jul 15, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 1998 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |