USPTO serial 74694164
SHIFT KITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHIFT KITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark P. Stone
MARK P STONE1100 HIGH RIDGE RD STE 205STAMFORD, CT 06905UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automotive transmission valve body components, namely, separator plates and springs; automotive transmission valve body parts sold as a unit for installation in the valve bodies of vehicle automatic transmissions; and valve body kits comprising separator plates and springs for the installation in the valve bodies of vehicle automatic transmissions | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |