USPTO serial 74694775
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS625 SLATERS LN FOURTH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | wire mesh pulling grips, termination tools kits, splice kits, stripping tools, polishing fixtures, and hotmelt termination kits in the nature of splice kits | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | electrical, electronic and fiber optic apparatus, instruments and products, namely, fiber optic cables, distribution cables, breakout cables, subgrouping cables, assembly cables, aerial messenger cables, armored cables, electro-optical cables, military tactical field cables, tempest cables also known as transient electromagnetic pulse emission shielding techniques cables, CATV/TELCO cables, under carpet cables, and zero halogen cables, cable connectors, connector mating adaptors, cable assemblies and pigtails, fanout/breakout tubing, innerduct, mechanical splices, splice trays and housings, transceivers, modems, fiber multiplexers, rack mount patch panels, wall mount patch panels, attenuators, optical power meters, fiber line drivers and laser sources | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 3, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |