Drawing for THE WISE EARTH

USPTO serial 74694906

THE WISE EARTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE WISE EARTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert E. Rosenthal

JAMES R MEYER SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP1600 MARKET ST STE 3600PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely, lipstick, foundation, cheek color mascara, face powder and eye shadow; fragrance products, namely, perfume, eau de toilette, eau de parfum, body lotion, body cream and soap; bath products, namely, soap, shower gel, bubble bath, bath salt and bath oil; toiletries, namely, hair care preparations and conditioners and personal deodorant; skin care products, namely, day lotion, night cream, toner, cleanser, spot treatment, throat treatment, eye treatment, neck treatment, decolletage treatment, hand treatment and body treatment; potpourri, aromatic oils, room sprays and room deodorizersACTIVE—
004fragrance candlesACTIVE—
005preparations for use in bath and toiletry products for use in connection with herbal and earth-related remedies, homeopathy, naturopathy and aromatherapy; healing lotions and crystal oils and lotionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2000EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 1999EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 14, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 7, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 18, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 8, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 10, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 18, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 14, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance