Drawing for WEB COMMERCE

USPTO serial 74695276

WEB COMMERCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEB COMMERCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Samuels

JEFFREY M SAMUELS SPENCER, FRANK & SCHNEIDERSTE 300 E1100 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3955

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016magazines, magazines supplements, catalogues, manuals, brochures, pamphlets, guides, newsletters, journals and books in the fields of computers, on-line services, high technology, communications and information servicesABANDONED—
042providing on-line magazines, magazine supplements, catalogues, manuals, brochures, pamphlets, guides, newsletters, journals and books in the fields of computers, on-line services, high technology, communications and information servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 22, 1998EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 22, 1998EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 10, 1997CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 15, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 4, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 1997ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance