Drawing for CRANEMATE

USPTO serial 74695468

CRANEMATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRANEMATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT V. VICKERS

ROBERT V VICKERS VICKERS, DANIELS & YOUNG2000 TERMINAL TWRCLEVELAND, OH 44113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electrical and electronic crane drive control systems for controlling crane motor speed and directionABANDONEDAug 26, 1975

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 1998ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Sep 24, 1997ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 26, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 11, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 5, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 23, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 15, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 18, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 20, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance