USPTO serial 74697605
CASTROLAERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRIEGEL, ADAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CASTROLAERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert D. Hart III
HERBERT D HART III MCANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY, LTDNORTHWESTERN ATRIUM CTR34TH FL 500 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | auxiliary fluids for use in machining and/or metalworking operations; coolants for vehicle engines and aircraft engines; hydraulic fluids for general use; degreasing preparations used in aircraft engines; coolants for vehicle engines and aircraft engines; automobile cooling system rust inhibitors; radiator additives to prevent rust; brake fluid; chemical dispersants for use in engines; chemical descalents and scale preventatives for engines | ABANDONED | — |
| 004 | transmission fluids | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1997 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |