Drawing for 222 FILM.COM

USPTO serial 74698852

222 FILM.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIFMAN, ARI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 222 FILM.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy J. Benjamin

AMY J BENJAMIN DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035interactive directory services for the promotion and advertising of movies and theater information through use of personal computers employing computer communication information networksABANDONED—
038telephonic transmission of data for informing others regarding movie information, associated theater information, and information for ticket sales through use of personal computers employing computer communication information networksABANDONED—
041interactive and pre-recorded information services and ticket sales services in connection with theater presentations of movies, information regarding the theaters,and advance ticket sales through use of personal computers employing computer communication information networksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 20, 1998PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 10, 1998PRIMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED—
Dec 29, 1997PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 1997IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Feb 11, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 10, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance