USPTO serial 74700542
NEO-IMMUNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEO-IMMUNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WESTON, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Adams
ROBERT W ADAMS NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC1100 N GLEBE RD EIGHT FLARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | immunosuppressant preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |