USPTO serial 74701291
SHORTLINER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHORTLINER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darin H. Duphorne
DARIN H DUPHORNE TOBOR & GOLDSTEIN, LLP1360 POST OAK BLVD STE 2300HOUSTON, TX 77056UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal fittings, tubing and hoses for use in connection with cured-in-place liners and expansion bladders for pipelines | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | pipeline rehabilitation devices, namely, non-metal cured-in-place liners for pipelines, expansion bladders, processed resins and non-metal pipeline and bladder fittings, tubings and hoses for use in connection therewith; and pipeline rehabilitation systems composed of non-metal cured-in-place liners for pipelines, expansion bladders, processed resins and metal and non-metal pipeline and bladder fittings, tubings and hoses for use in connection therewith, sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |