USPTO serial 74701879
MINT JULEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MINT JULEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C. Schnedler
STEVEN C SCHNEDLER CARTER & SCHNEDLER, PA56 CENTRAL AVE #103P O BOX 2985ASHEVILLE, NC 28802Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | bakery goods; bakery products; barbecue sauce; bases for making milkshakes; biscuits; bubble gum; cakes; candied fruit; candied fruit snacks; candied nuts; candy; candy coated popcorn; candy mints; chewing gum; chocolate; chocolate chips; chocolate covered nuts; chocolate fondue; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable-based; chocolate powder; chocolate syrup; chocolate topping; chocolate truffles; chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies; cocoa; cocoa mixes; coffee; coffee substitutes; cones for ice cream; confectionery chips for baking; cookies; corn syrup; crackers; crepes; crumpets; custard-based fillings for cakes and pies; custards; edible cake decorations; eclairs; extracts used as flavoring; flavored ices; flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes; flavoring syrup; food additives for non-nutritional pupposes for use as flavoring, ingredient or filler; frosting mixes; frostings; frozen confections; frozen custards; frozen yogurt; fruit ice; fruit pies; glazed popcorn; grain or chicory based coffee substitutes; ham glaze; herb tea; herbal tea; herbal food beverages; hot chocolate; ice cream; ice cream substitute; ice milk; icing; icing mixes; marinades; marshmallow topping; marshmallows; milkshakes; mixes for bakery goods; mixes for making bakery goods; non-medicated lozenges; parfaits; pancake syrup; puddings; puffed corn snacks; rice-based snack foods; sauces; seasoned coating for meat, fish, poultry; shakes; sherbet; sorbet; soy-based ice cream substitute; sugar; topping syrup; tapioca; tea; wafers; and waffles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |