USPTO serial 74704524
YLAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YLAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIE S MALLOY
JENNIE S MALLOY HISTORIC CORAL WAYMALLOY & MALLOY, PA2800 SW THIRD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair removal products, namely, waxes, hair removal creams, hair removing lotions, and cosmetics, namely, skin creams, skin moisturizers, foundation makeup, eye shadow, eyeliners, eye brow pencils, lip liner, mascara, blushes and face and body powder | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 12, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 1998 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1997 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 27, 1997 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |