USPTO serial 74704660
GS ALERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GS ALERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PRESTON C REGEHR
PRESTON C REGEHR VAN COTT BAGLEY CORNWALL & MCCARTHY50 S MAIN ST STE 1600SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | automatic telephone dialers for use in security systems; hand held security alarms; burglar alarms; silent burglar, fire and alarm systems, security devices for use with fire alarms, namely, silent and audible systems and telecommunication signal alarms; smoke alarms; temperature sending units which sense and send temperature via telecommunication; wireless infant monitors; wireless portable child location and monitoring devices | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | automobile anti-theft alarms | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 1996 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |