Drawing for CD CONCORD HOMES

USPTO serial 74705865

CD CONCORD HOMES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CD CONCORD HOMES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas C. McDonough

ROBERT E BROWNE VEDDER PRICE KAUFMAN & KAMMHOLZ222 N LASALLE ST STE 2600CHICAGO, IL 60601-1003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037residential real estate development and building constructionACTIVEJul 21, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 16, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 13, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 28, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 11, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 21, 1997REINREINSTATED—
Dec 10, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 29, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance