USPTO serial 74705865
CD CONCORD HOMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CD CONCORD HOMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas C. McDonough
ROBERT E BROWNE VEDDER PRICE KAUFMAN & KAMMHOLZ222 N LASALLE ST STE 2600CHICAGO, IL 60601-1003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | residential real estate development and building construction | ACTIVE | Jul 21, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 13, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |