USPTO serial 74705878
I'M THE LITTLE SISTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 1999
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with I'M THE LITTLE SISTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LaValle D. Ptak
LAVALLE D PTAK LAW OFFICE OF LAVALLE D PTAK28435 N 42ND ST STE BCAVE CREEK, AZ 85331UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, T-shirts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 2, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |