USPTO serial 74705890
MUSIC PIZZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TUCCILLO, SUSANA M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MUSIC PIZZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD D MON
SUSAN CRANE GOLDEN BOOKS FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT INC888 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10106UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | party supplies, namely, party favors in the nature of small toys, crackers, and noisemakers; video, audio, and interactive games which are directed to children for their entertainment and education in enhancing their appreciation and enjoyment of music or to provide instruction for the playing of a musical instrument, namely, interactive video games of virtual reality comprised of computer hardware and software, coin-operated video games, video output game machines, video game machines, interactive video game programs, video game software, interactive audio game discs, and interactive multimedia computer game programs; electronic, electronically actuated, and electronically operated toys and games, namely, kazoos, toy pianos, musical toys, and action toys; plush and non-plush dolls, and toy statuettes, for the pleasure and collection by children; and electronic hand-held games, namely, hand-held units for playing electronic games | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |