USPTO serial 74706185
PARENTS' TELEVISION COUNCIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLEMBOCKI, ERICA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARENTS' TELEVISION COUNCIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher T. Craig
CHRISTOPHER T CRAIG HERGE, SPARKS & CHRISTOPHERSTE 2008201 GREENSBORO DRMCLEAN, VA 22102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | educational newsletters, guides and brochures concerning the entertainment industry, namely television, movies and radio | ABANDONED | Nov 29, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 11, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |