USPTO serial 74706497
VIDEOPREFACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIDEOPREFACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark C. Jacobs
MARK C JACOBS LAW OFFICE OF MARK C JACOBS3033 EL CAMINO AVESACRAMENTO, CA 95821UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded video tapes, disks, CD-ROMs and computer software containing introductory discussions by at least the author, concerning the content of a book and about the author of the book | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | business marketing consultation services and cooperative marketing and advertising pertaining to taped presentations concerning books and their authors | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | video tape production services pertaining to taped presentations concerning books and their authors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pentamedia Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pentamedia Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named VIDEOPREFACE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 3, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |