Drawing for VIDEOPREFACE

USPTO serial 74706497

VIDEOPREFACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SZOKE, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIDEOPREFACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark C. Jacobs

MARK C JACOBS LAW OFFICE OF MARK C JACOBS3033 EL CAMINO AVESACRAMENTO, CA 95821UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009prerecorded video tapes, disks, CD-ROMs and computer software containing introductory discussions by at least the author, concerning the content of a book and about the author of the bookACTIVE—
035business marketing consultation services and cooperative marketing and advertising pertaining to taped presentations concerning books and their authorsACTIVE—
041video tape production services pertaining to taped presentations concerning books and their authorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 20, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 31, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 7, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 3, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 6, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 10, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance