Drawing for DAKIN'S QUALITY GRAFTED MINIATURES

USPTO serial 74706577

DAKIN'S QUALITY GRAFTED MINIATURES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAKIN'S QUALITY GRAFTED MINIATURES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stanley R. Jones

STANLEY R JONES STAN JONES, PATENTS49 MIDDLE STHALLOWELL, ME 04347UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020young and teen-age figurine collectibles, namely, wooden miniature horse stalls, bars and farm-yard related accessories and suppliesACTIVEFeb 15, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 8, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 8, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 8, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 9, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 23, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 4, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 19, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 11, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 31, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 29, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 12, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance