USPTO serial 74706577
DAKIN'S QUALITY GRAFTED MINIATURES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAKIN'S QUALITY GRAFTED MINIATURES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley R. Jones
STANLEY R JONES STAN JONES, PATENTS49 MIDDLE STHALLOWELL, ME 04347UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | young and teen-age figurine collectibles, namely, wooden miniature horse stalls, bars and farm-yard related accessories and supplies | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 11, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |