Drawing for 1-800-THE SOFA

USPTO serial 74706632

1-800-THE SOFA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1-800-THE SOFA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD HOWARD

EDWARD HOWARD COLLEGE CTRBUCHANAN INGERSOLL PC500 COLLEGE RD EPRINCETON, NJ 08540

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing same day or within two hour delivery for telephone shop at home services via a toll-free telephone number, in the field of convertible bedding with the term convertible bedding being defined to encompass convertible sofas, convertible couches, convertible divans, sofa-beds, and other convertible seatingACTIVEMar 19, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 10, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 10, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 17, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 6, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 10, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 27, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 3, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 1997AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 16, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 19, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance