USPTO serial 74706876
VISIONAMERICA LASER CENTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISIONAMERICA LASER CENTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott K. Haight
SCOTT K HAIGHT BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN & CALDWELLFIRST TENNESSEE BLDG - 20TH FL165 MADISON AVEMEMPHIS, TN 38103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing business management services; advertising services, namely, preparing audio-visual presentations for use in advertising on television and radio for ophthalmologists and optometrists, direct mail advertising and mark research services to ophthalmologists and optometrists | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ophthalmology services, optometry services, operating and managing medical eye health clinics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2000 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 11, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |