USPTO serial 74707317
ARAZZO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARAZZO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONTREAL, Quebec, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC H3Z 2S4, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC H3Z 2S4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VICTOR M TANNENBAUM
VICTOR M TANNENBAUM ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's clothing, namely, suits, jackets, pants, trousers, slacks, vests, blazers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SFI TROUSER COMPANY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SILVERSTAN HOLDINGS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SILVERSTAN HOLDINGS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ARAZZO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |