USPTO serial 74707762
MINNESOTA FATS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLEMBOCKI, ERICA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MINNESOTA FATS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RONALD L PANITCH
RONALD L PANITCH AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP2005 MARKET ST 22ND FLONE COMMERCE SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7086Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | printed circuit boards and computer software for the playing of video games | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | video game diskettes, video game CD-ROMs, video game cartridges, video game discs, video game tape cassettes, video game software, computer game software, electronic interactive video games for dedicated home video game machines, interactive multimedia computer game programs for personal computers, hand-held video game machines, video output game machines, video output game machine kits comprising video game cartridges and hand-held video game machine unit, video output game machine cartridge kits comprising video game cartridges and game machine unit, coin operated arcade video game machines, board games and jigsaw puzzles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |