USPTO serial 74707958
RAMCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAMCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick S. Burkhart
FREDERICK S BURKHART VAN DYKE, GARDNER, LINN & BURKHART, LLPSTE 2072851 CHARLEVOIX DR S EGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | lights for vehicles, namely map lights, courtesy lights, dome lights, door panel lights, opera lights, and third brake lights | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1998 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |