Drawing for INTELL-XX

USPTO serial 74708528

INTELL-XX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, MARGARET
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELL-XX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES C PRINCE

JAMES C PRINCE HARTZOG CONGER CASON & HARGIS1600 BANK OF OKLAHOMA PLZ201 ROBERT S KERROKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for generating business reports which consists of summarizations of information previously published in a wide variety of newspapers, periodicals and other sourcesABANDONED—
042computer services, namely, providing access to computer data bases from which users may retrieve summaries of information on a wide variety of topics which have been published in a wide variety of newspapers, periodicals and other sourcesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 1998ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 1997ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 20, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance