USPTO serial 74708824
SERVER/CLIENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SERVER/CLIENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Scott
THOMAS J SCOTT UNISYS CORPORATIONTOWNSHIP LINE AND UNION MEETING RDSP O BOX 500BLUE BELL, PA 19424-0001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely a series of object-oriented software development programs used to build programs, run and manage networks | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | printed publications, namely programmer, operator, installation and maintenance manuals for use with object-oriented software development tools used to build programs, run and manage networks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |