USPTO serial 74708946
CRYO-CHILL'
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRYO-CHILL'?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Markham, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arne I. Fors
ARNE I FORS GOWLING, STRATHY & HENDERSONSTE 4900, COMMERCE COURT WTORONTO, ON M5L 1J3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | equipment for chilling food, processing and storage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |