USPTO serial 74709034
MEDINOV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDINOV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Moose
RICHARD M MOOSE DORITY & MANNINGSTE 15700 E N STGREENVILLE, SC 29601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | scientific apparatus and instruments, namely, traditional mechanical energy, shape memory alloy based mechanical energy, electrical and electronical energy scientific apparatus and instruments, namely, ancillaries for fitting prosthesis or lengthening nails, and clips for osteosynthesis; products and equipments for surgical use, in particular for orthopaedic surgery, namely, prosthesis and prosthesis parts and fittings for the hip, knee, shoulder, hand, wrist, foot and ankle joints; traumatology articles, namely, surgical plates, nails, lengthening nails, pins and external fixer members, namely, fixators for the osteosynthesis of the various types of bones; apparatus and instrumentations, ancillaries and devices intended to a local or general application on the spine, namely, vertebral disks, intersomatic cages, artificial vertebra, osteosynthesis devices for surgical treatment, namely, clips, screws, stems and orthopaedic cements and glues; traditional or new surgical instruments such as those used in the coelioscopic surgery, namely, forceps, insufflators, trocars and endoscopes; apparatus and fittings for endoscopy, namely, forceps, retractors, pumps intended to aspirate body fluids, to clean the field of operation and to control pressures, endoscopes and atrhroscopes; apparatus and instruments for surgery or used in surgical and medical assistance using imagery technics, namely, mechanical supports for surgical instruments, bone virtual display devices, lasers and bistouries; products and materials used for sealing surgical prosthesis, namely, biocompatible cements and glues | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |