Drawing for MAC FLOTRONICS

USPTO serial 74709178

MAC FLOTRONICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, CHAD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAC FLOTRONICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dean D. Small

DEAN D SMALL KOKJER, KIRCHER, BOWMAN & JOHNSON, PC2414 COMMERCE TWR 911 MAINKANSAS CITY, MO 64105-2088UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007machinery for conveying and blending powered, pelletized and granular materials through a conduit, namely, gravity blenders, rotary airlocks, airlock feeders, line diverters, elutriators and cyclonesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 1998EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 6, 1998EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 29, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 24, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 21, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 16, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 19, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance